Book:
Degree of GuiltWriter(s): Richard North Patterson
Really excellent book. This one picks up after The Lasko Incident, twenty years later. We find out the lawyer, Christopher Paget, had a son with Mary Carelli, the woman who betrayed him in the first book (in the first book I could never understand why they slept together, considering they hated each other). Now she's become a famous ABC television journalist and Paget has raised his son. Now she wants his help: she's killed a famous writer and needs a lawyer. She claims it was self-defense -- he tried to rape her -- but her story is full of holes. As the prosecution and Paget investigate, they discover more and more holes in her story, including not one, but two secret motives for killing the man. This is riveting drama: you can't put the book down. Patterson definitely understands lawyering and puts together a terrific and complicated case, interwoven with the personal issues of the two main characters. It's not a perfect book: Patterson still has his problem with referring to characters we don't remember (but it's not as bad as before); he sometimes quotes long passages verbatim from the first book as flashbacks (why not condense it for us?); and the very end conclusion, with Paget accepting the truth Carelli was trying to hide, is so obvious a conclusion it never occurred to me to think otherwise (if Paget had, I'd have thought him a monster). (Unfortunately, I can't get more specific than that without giving away a major plot point.) Excellent read: you may not need to bother with the first book, though it's good to read both to see how far Patterson has come as a writer. Very impressive, even brilliant in places, though I really dislike the way his politics and biases continue to shine through (he inserts snide little comments every now and then, very subtly, such as when he refers to the disgusting and out-and-out evil behavior of Mary Carelli as "amoral" -- that's in the same sentence where he suggests she might be a murderer -- that's a lawyer trick and so typical of what's taught in schools these days, degrading morality into something gray and less than pure, that it made me want to puke). My original interest in Patterson came from a radio interview where he talked about his new book which deals with the abortion issue, something his publishers begged him not to write about, and even though it was obvious I disagree with his perspective, he sounded like he'd be fair and the concept was intriguing. After reading just a couple of his novels, I seriously doubt that he could be fair, though we'll see. (What bothers me about bias in a novel like this is not that an author has an opinion: I have no problem with that, even if it's an opinion I violently disagree with. My problem is when the author claims to be fair and "unbiased" when it is obvious they are not. If I write a book, for instance, I won't claim to be the slightest bit objective: it will reflect my values and beliefs and that's the way it should be. When authors claim to be "fair" and are not, they essentially are redefining the word fair, i.e. fair is when their point-of-view is subtly projected and yours is mitigated or mocked. All that said, I must say that Patterson is not the worst author in this regard, just one of the most subtle, and therefore devious. Keep that in mind when you read him.)
Labels: Book